See Miller v. California, ante, p. 413 U. S. 37 (DOUGLAS, J., dissenting). The number of these stores was so estimated by both parties at oral argument. These stores purport to bar minors from the premises. In this case, there is no evidence that petitioner sold materials to juveniles. Cf. Miller v. California, ante at 413 U. S. 120.

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 64|Issue 4 Article 3 1974 Pornography: Miller v. California, 93 S. Ct. 2607 (1973), Paris Adult Theatre I, et. al. v. Slaton, 93 S. Miller V California - The Background of Miller v. California (1973)Miller v. California was a Supreme Court case involving an individual named Marvin Miller, who was in ownership of a commercial operation that undertook the provision of items considered to be ‘sexually explicit’ in nature. miller v. california supreme court of the united states 413 u.s. 15 june 21, 1973, decided Miller v. California 413 U.S. 15 (1973) In this landmark case, the Court reexamined and discarded the obscenity standard set by Justice Brennan in the Roth case 16 years previously,

Miller, after conducting a mass mailing campaign to advertise the sale of "adult" material, was convicted of violating a California statute prohibiting the distribution of obscene material. Some unwilling recipients of Miller's brochures complained to the police, initiating the legal proceedings.

Miller v. California (1973) 413 U.S. 15 (1973) | Burger Court. Back to all. Resources » Miller v. California (1973) Summary. Primary Docs. Links. Synopsis . Miller v. California concerned the conviction of Marvin Miller, the owner of a mail-order pornography business, under the Californial Penal Code. It is notable for establishing the

Miller v. California |

Miller v. California. Legal decision. By: Supreme Court of the United States Date: June 21, 1973 Source: Miller v. California 415 US 13 (1973).. About the Author: The Supreme Court is the highest judicial body in the United States, composed of eight justices and one chief justice. Chief Justice Warren Burger (1907–1995) delivered the opinion of the court in this case. Miller v. California | law case | Britannica